The Lion's Mane
The moment someone mentions a lion, the mind conjures up an image of a magnificent beast whose most prominent mark of identification is it's mane. Charles Darwin theorized that the lion's mane existed to dampen the blows received from attacks by conspecifics. He was also the first to categorize them as a social trait, considering that lions are the only cats with manes and the only social cat. It has remained a status symbol to most people, but for years it was thought to enhance the chances of mating - a sexual trait - a thick mane signifying the male's fighting ability and nutritional status. The thicker and darker the mane, the overall fitness of the male would be advertised well to opponents as well as to potential mates.
If the lion's mane evolved to protect the neck area from injury during fights with opponents, it would be a consistent trait among all populations of lions throughout their range. Lions found in some areas are known to have scanty or thin manes. Studies conducted by the Lion Research Centre, University of Minnesota, have found that there is no evidence to suggest the neck is the prime area of attack, hence evolution would not necessarily have confined a think mane to the neck region, and if it did then there would be a similar adaptation in the case of juveniles and females, as they too are involved in occassional bouts of ill-temper. Of course, their experiments to prove that the mane is a sexual trait were successful. It was found that females did prefer males with darker, thicker manes and the males with such manes had higher levels of testosterone. But it still did not explain the lack of manes in males found in other regions.
The thickness of the mane has one very serious drawback. In warm climates such as in the tropical sanctuary of Gir in India and in the lower elevation habitats for lions in Africa, the males would suffer from heat stress. Evolution then stepped in to take control. Lions in the lower elevation, warmer climes have very scanty manes, similar to those of the males found in India.
An ingenious study conducted on zoo animals throughout the United States showed that the thickness of the lion's mane is directly related to the temperature that it lives in. Colder the temperature, thicker the mane, luckier the male will be with the ladies. The study suggests that the condition of the mane has no relationship with social or sexual factors, or with genetics. Zoo animals in warmer climates lost their manes to avoid overheating their bodies. There is a theory that states that if global temperatures keep inceasing, then the males with luxurious, thick, black manes that one would image a lion as would become a thing of the past.
In a similar study across the African wilderness, it was found that lions developed manes according to the climatic conditions of the area. Lions in equatorial East Africa have varied mane thicknesses depending on the elevation of their habitat. The most beautiful, thick manes occurred in higher elevations and the condition of "manelessness" was found in populations inhabiting the lower elevations such as areas around Tsavo.
But there was a hitch. Paradoxically, some males in the Tsavo population who were not supposed to sport good manes were found to do so. In fact it was reported that the mane variation in this region crossed the entire spectrum, from almost no manes to the most luxurious manes. The latest study shows that the lion's mane continues to develop way after the individual has crossed it's sexual prime. Young lions were found to have lesser manes than the older ones, the mane continued to grow as the individual grew older. Lions in the age group of 3-7 years, the ones in their prime were found to have marginal manes, while the older classes possessed enviable manes. This can be theorized as being related to the temperature again. Young lions require all their potential to mate, they cannot afford any loss of energy through heat stress, hence the lesser manes. But as they grow and cannot compete in the sexual arena, the manes grow.
This topic was first discussed in 1833 by Capt. W. Smee - “On the maneless lion of Gujerat,” Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London; part 1, page 140, 1833.
This is still a debatable issue. On the one hand there is ample evidence that suggests the mane is more a sexual trait, while on the other groundbreaking research suggests a link to age. This cannot be concluded unless the condition of the lion's mane is studied throughout the range, including all subpopulations in Africa as well as in India. Scientists have also tried to link the lack of manes in some males to the baldness gene carried only by the males.
If the lion's mane evolved to protect the neck area from injury during fights with opponents, it would be a consistent trait among all populations of lions throughout their range. Lions found in some areas are known to have scanty or thin manes. Studies conducted by the Lion Research Centre, University of Minnesota, have found that there is no evidence to suggest the neck is the prime area of attack, hence evolution would not necessarily have confined a think mane to the neck region, and if it did then there would be a similar adaptation in the case of juveniles and females, as they too are involved in occassional bouts of ill-temper. Of course, their experiments to prove that the mane is a sexual trait were successful. It was found that females did prefer males with darker, thicker manes and the males with such manes had higher levels of testosterone. But it still did not explain the lack of manes in males found in other regions.
The thickness of the mane has one very serious drawback. In warm climates such as in the tropical sanctuary of Gir in India and in the lower elevation habitats for lions in Africa, the males would suffer from heat stress. Evolution then stepped in to take control. Lions in the lower elevation, warmer climes have very scanty manes, similar to those of the males found in India.
An ingenious study conducted on zoo animals throughout the United States showed that the thickness of the lion's mane is directly related to the temperature that it lives in. Colder the temperature, thicker the mane, luckier the male will be with the ladies. The study suggests that the condition of the mane has no relationship with social or sexual factors, or with genetics. Zoo animals in warmer climates lost their manes to avoid overheating their bodies. There is a theory that states that if global temperatures keep inceasing, then the males with luxurious, thick, black manes that one would image a lion as would become a thing of the past.
In a similar study across the African wilderness, it was found that lions developed manes according to the climatic conditions of the area. Lions in equatorial East Africa have varied mane thicknesses depending on the elevation of their habitat. The most beautiful, thick manes occurred in higher elevations and the condition of "manelessness" was found in populations inhabiting the lower elevations such as areas around Tsavo.
But there was a hitch. Paradoxically, some males in the Tsavo population who were not supposed to sport good manes were found to do so. In fact it was reported that the mane variation in this region crossed the entire spectrum, from almost no manes to the most luxurious manes. The latest study shows that the lion's mane continues to develop way after the individual has crossed it's sexual prime. Young lions were found to have lesser manes than the older ones, the mane continued to grow as the individual grew older. Lions in the age group of 3-7 years, the ones in their prime were found to have marginal manes, while the older classes possessed enviable manes. This can be theorized as being related to the temperature again. Young lions require all their potential to mate, they cannot afford any loss of energy through heat stress, hence the lesser manes. But as they grow and cannot compete in the sexual arena, the manes grow.
This topic was first discussed in 1833 by Capt. W. Smee - “On the maneless lion of Gujerat,” Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London; part 1, page 140, 1833.
This is still a debatable issue. On the one hand there is ample evidence that suggests the mane is more a sexual trait, while on the other groundbreaking research suggests a link to age. This cannot be concluded unless the condition of the lion's mane is studied throughout the range, including all subpopulations in Africa as well as in India. Scientists have also tried to link the lack of manes in some males to the baldness gene carried only by the males.
Technorati tags: lion's mane, sexual trait, genetic adaptation, heat stress, manelessness, age related
